In fact, research clearly shows that the cost of climate inaction far outweighs the cost of reducing carbon pollution. A recent study suggests that if the U.S. fails to meet its Paris climate goals, it could cost the economy up to $6 trillion in the coming decades. A global failure to comply with the DND currently set out in the agreement could reduce global GDP by more than 25% by the end of the century. Meanwhile, another study estimates that achieving – or even exceeding – that the Paris targets could be very beneficial on a global scale by investing in infrastructure in clean energy and energy efficiency, to the amount of about $19 trillion. “The decision to leave the Paris Agreement was wrong when it was announced and it is still wrong today,” said Helen Mountford of the World Resources Institute. Support for this move and opposition have been reported under Trump`s cabinet and advisers: Energy Secretary Rick Perry, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Economic Adviser Gary Cohn and Adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner would have wanted the US to stick to the deal, while the White House adviser, Steve Bannon, White House adviser Don McGahn and EPO administrator Scott Pruitt wanted the US to abandon him.  While the current agreement effectively blocks the development of clean coal in America – what it does and the mines begin to open. We have a big opening in two weeks. Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, so many places. A large opening of a brand new mine. This is unheard of. That has not been the case for years.
They asked me if I was going to leave. I will try. INDCs become NDCs – national contributions – as soon as a country formally accedes to the agreement. There are no specific requirements on how or to what extent countries should reduce emissions, but there were political expectations about the nature and rigour of different countries` targets. As a result, national plans are very different in scale and ambition and largely reflect each country`s capabilities, level of development and contribution to emissions over time. For example, China has committed to leveling its CO2 emissions by 2030 at the latest and reducing CO2 emissions per unit of gross domestic product (GDP) by 60-65% by 2030 compared to their 2005 level. India has set a target of reducing emissions intensity by 33-35% compared to 2005 by 2030 and producing 40% of its electricity from non-fossil sources. But U.S. participation in the Paris Agreement is not definitively over. The U.S.
could opt for a return and Democratic candidate Joe Biden has promised to return to the deal “on day one” if he wins the election. If it did, the United States could officially resume its role under the Paris Agreement in mid-February. The main objective of the agreement is to keep the increase in global average temperature well below 2°C compared to pre-industrial levels”, including by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The agreement differs from the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, the last widespread amendment to the UNFCCC, in the absence of annexes aimed at reducing the liability of developing countries. . . .