Syllabication For Agreement

Here are some special cases for the subject-verb agreement in English: in Hungarian, verbs are polypersonal, which means that they correspond to more than one of the arguments of the verb: not only with its subject, but also with its object (battery). There is a distinction between the case where there is a particular object and the case where the object is indeterminate or where there is no object at all. (Adverbians have no influence on the form of the verb.) Examples: Szeretek (I like someone or something unspecified), more (I love him, she, she or she, in particular), szeretlek (I love you); szeret (he loves me, us, you, someone or something indeterminate), szereti (he loves him, him or her specifically). Of course, names or pronouns can specify the exact object. In short, there is a correspondence between a verb and the person and the number of its subject and the specificity of its object (which often relates more or less precisely to the person). Snodgrass and Vanderwarts (1980) series of 260 standardized images for American English have been extended to 400 images (Cycowicz, Friedman, Rothstein, &Snodgrass, 1997). Although the latter, advanced, was originally designed for children, standards have been collected for adults speaking different languages, including French (Alario & Ferrand, 1999), Italian (Nisi, Longoni & Snodgrass, 2000), Greek (Dimitropoulou, Duñabeitia, Blitsas & Carreiras, 2009), Spanish (Manoiloff, Artstein, Canavoso, Fernáá and Segui, 2010); Sanfeliu & Fernandez, 1996), Turkish (Raman, Raman & Mertan, 2014), Japanese (Nishimoto, Miyawaki, Ueda, Une & Takahashi, 2005), Persian (Bakhtiar, Nilipour & Weekes, 2012) and Chinese (Weekes, Shu, Hao, Liu & Tan, 2007). This set of images is one of the most frequently used in research studies on the designation of images of adults as well as on other tasks (for example. B the recognition of objects, the decision of an object, etc.). Several of these studies have shown that variables such as nickname and familiarity (for which we specify norms in this study) are culture-specific and vary from one linguistic community to another.

This highlights the importance of obtaining standards for different languages and even different varieties of the same language (e.g. B Argentine Spanish vs. Spanish spoken in Spain). Modern English is not very consistent, although it exists. After Cortese and Schock (2013) and Yap and Balota (2009), the predictor variables were grouped together. They were then captured in three different steps in the regression models. Step 1 contains 16 dichotomous variables coded for the characteristics of the initial phonemes in TA: vocal, alveolar, postveolar, pharyngeal, palatal, dental, trill, glottal, uvular, pharyngelalized, labiodental, approximant, plosif, velar, bilabial and nasal…